Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
SANILKUMAR S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of detention order under pitndps act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding improper order provision. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standards for detention of individuals in custody. (Para 6 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. requirements for valid preventive detention orders. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. decision to dismiss based on insufficient grounds. (Para 14) |
Jobin Sebastian, J.
This writ petition is directed against a detention order passed under Section 3 (1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (PITNDPS Act for brevity) against one Anila Raveendran, D/o. Raveendran Pillai ('detenu' for the sake of brevity). The said detention order stands confirmed by the Government, vide order dated 22.10.2025, and the detenu has been ordered to be detained for a period of one year with effect from the date of detention.
2. As evident from the records, it was on the basis of a proposal dated 17.05.2025, forwarded by the District Police Chief, Kollam City, that the jurisdictional authority initiated proceedings against the detenu under Section 3 (1) of the PITNDPS Act. Algother two cases in which the detenu got involved have been considered by the jurisdictional au
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
