R.BANUMATHI, A.S.BOPANNA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
DIMPLE HAPPY DHAKAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. BANUMATHI, J.
Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 25.06.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombayin W.P. (Crl.) Nos.2843 and 2844 of 2019 in and by which the High Court has quashed the detention orders dated 17.05.2019 passed against the detenues. The appellants-Union of India in appeals arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.5459 and 5460 of 2019 have challenged the impugned judgment quashing the detention orders. While quashing the detention orders, the High Court has stayed the operation of its own order for a period of one week to enable the appellants to approach the Supreme Court. Being aggrieved by the stay, the detenues-respondents have preferred appeals arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.5396 and 5408 of 2019 before this Court. All the appeals shall stand disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The facts giving rise to these appeals are that pursuant to an investigation by the office of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence in the matter of smuggling of foreign origin gold by a syndicate of persons from UAE to India. On 28.03.2019 search and interception of two vehicles i.e. a Honda Activa Scooter and a Honda City car was held. It was noti
Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu through Secretary to Government
Virendra Singh v. State of Maharashtra
Ana Carelina D’souza (Smt.) v. Union of India
Sophia Gulam Mohd. Bham v. State of Maharashtra
Icchu Devi Choraria v. Union of India
Jasbir Singh v. Lt. Governor, Delhi
Mehdi Mohamed Joudi v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India v. Paul Manickam
Huidrom Konungjao Singh v. State of Manipur
Dharmendra Suganchand Chelawat v. Union of India
Senthamilselvi v. State of T.N.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.