IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DR. JOSEPH ANTO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI or such other writ, direction or orders, calling for the records leading up to Exhibit P-8 and quash the same;
ii. Issue a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS or such other writ, direction, or orders, directing the 2 nd Respondent to remove the Petitioners’ property comprised in in Sy. No. 473/2 (Re. Sy. No. 1804/27) of Peringavu Village, Thrissur Taluk totally admeasuring 12.64 ares from the Exhibit P-5 Data Bank.
iii. Declare that the Petitioners’ property comprised in in Sy. No. 473/2 (Re. Sy. No. 1804/27 ) of Peringavu Village, Thrissur Taluk totally admeasuring 12.64 ares is in the nature of a paramba iv. To dispense with the filing of translation of documents in vernacular language.
v. Pass any such order which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice.
(SIC)
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by them under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.