Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DAS MAMMEN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner aggrieved by rejection of application. (Para 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds deficiencies in order compliance. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. To pass a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside Exhibit P11 Order passed by the 3rd respondent herein as it is not in compliance with law and directions of this Honourable Court.
ii. To pass a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent herein to re-consider Exhibit P5 Form 5 application by conducting proper site inspection and considering the Exhibit P13 order passed by the 2nd respondent herein within a time frame as may be decided by this Honourable Court.
iii. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as the case may be as this Honourable Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice.
iv. Pleased to dispense with English translation of the documents produced herewith.
v. Award costs to the petitioners”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the Form–5 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
