SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5745

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
PATTASSERIL PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri. Varghese C. Kuriakose

ORDER

Under challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act' for short).

2. The revision petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 respectively, in CC No.2764 of 2001 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court -II, Ernakulam. They stood trial before that court for committing an offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.

3. The complainant is a company engaged in the manufacturing and sale of cement. The 1st accused is a private limited company, and the 2nd and 3rd accused are the directors of the 1st accused. The 1st accused purchased cement from the complainant company and, in discharge of the said liability, issued Ext.P2 cheque dated 21.08.2001 for Rs.8,71,695/- drawn on Canara Bank, Kadavanthra Branch. But when the cheque was presented for collection, it got dishonored for the reason that funds are insufficient. The statutory notice issued also did not evoke any response. Hence, the complainant approached the trial court by filing the afore complaint.

4. The trial court, on an appreciation of the evidence on record,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top