IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
PATTASSERIL PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under section 138 of ni act contested. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding evidential shortcomings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court critique of evidence and testimony adequacy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Under challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act' for short).
2. The revision petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 respectively, in CC No.2764 of 2001 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court -II, Ernakulam. They stood trial before that court for committing an offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.
3. The complainant is a company engaged in the manufacturing and sale of cement. The 1st accused is a private limited company, and the 2nd and 3rd accused are the directors of the 1st accused. The 1st accused purchased cement from the complainant company and, in discharge of the said liability, issued Ext.P2 cheque dated 21.08.2001 for Rs.8,71,695/- drawn on Canara Bank, Kadavanthra Branch. But when the cheque was presented for collection, it got dishonored for the reason t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.