Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SALEEM – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contests rejection of form-5 application. (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel deliberation on statutory compliance. (Para 3) |
| 3. court identifies errors in the authorized officer's assessment. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext. P2 order and quash the same.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to reconsider petitioner’s Form 5 application and pass orders afresh after properly considering Ext. P3 KSREC report.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to reconsider petitioner’s Form 5 application and pass orders afresh after obtaining KSREC report with regard to the petitioner’s property in Survey Nos. 289/6-3-2 and 289/5-
2.
iv) To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”
[SIC]
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
