IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MRS.BINDU SINOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“1. A writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Exhibit P6.
2. A writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to act based on Exhibit P5 Form 5 application.
3. Declare that the petitioner’s property having 1.21 Ares of land situated in Ernakulam District, Paravur Taluk, Karikkad Village, Nellikode Kara, at Survey No. comprised in Survey No. 119/2-52 is a garden land the petitioner can use the property for construction of house or any other purpose than agriculture activities.
4. Declare that the petitioners land cannot used for paddy cultivation and, wetland, water body, or pond and that the surrounding properties are also exclusively used for residential purposes.
5. Any other further reliefs this honourable court deem fit and proper to meet the end of justice.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 1st respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by her under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not consi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.