Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
BINDU KUNJUMON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges detention under kaa(p) act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding judicial custody and necessity of detention. (Para 4 , 5 , 14) |
| 3. criteria for valid detention orders outlined. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ petition denied, maintaining the detention order. (Para 15) |
J U D G M E N T
Jobin Sebastian, J.
The petitioner herein is the mother of one Vineesh Kunjumon ('detenu' for the sake of brevity), and her challenge in this Writ Petition is directed against Ext.P1 detention order dated 16.09.2025, passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act , 2007 (‘KAAP Act’ for brevity). The said detention order stands confirmed by the Government vide order dated 24.11.2025, and the detenu has been ordered to be detained for a period of one year with effect from the date of detention.
2. The records reveal that it was on 30.07.2025 that a proposal was submitted by the District Police Chief, Kottayam, seeking initiation of proceedings against the detenu under the KAA(P) Act, before the jurisdictional authority, the 2nd respondent. Altogether, four cases in which the detenu got involved have been consi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
