JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“1. Call for the records leading to Exhibit P4 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction;

2. Declare that the property covered by Ext. 1 is liable to be excluded from the data bank and direct the 2^nd respondent to remove the property from data bank;

3. Direct the 2ndrespondent to reconsider the application filed by the petitioners in Form No. 5(Ext. P3), after obtaining KSREC Report.

4. Dispense with the filing of translation of all vernacular documents.

5. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. ”

[SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 2^nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity).

The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the consid