Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PREETHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for land exclusion from paddy data bank. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing confirmed for the petitioner and the state. (Para 3) |
| 3. officer failed to comply with statutory land assessment requirements. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading to Ext.P7 dated
24.9.2024 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari finding that it is illegal.
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 6th respondent to reconsider and pass orders on Ext.P6 Form 5 application taking into consideration the KSREC report after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii) Declare that the property of the petitioner lying in 1.98 Ares of land lying in Survey No. 12.4 Ares of land lying in Survey No. 218/15, 218/16,218/52 & 218/9 (old Sy No. 272/1) of Nadathara Village in Thrissur Taluk in Thrissur District is not a paddy land and is liable to be excluded from the data bank.
iv) Dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
