IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PREETHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading to Ext.P7 dated
24.9.2024 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari finding that it is illegal.
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 6th respondent to reconsider and pass orders on Ext.P6 Form 5 application taking into consideration the KSREC report after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii) Declare that the property of the petitioner lying in 1.98 Ares of land lying in Survey No. 12.4 Ares of land lying in Survey No. 218/15, 218/16,218/52 & 218/9 (old Sy No. 272/1) of Nadathara Village in Thrissur Taluk in Thrissur District is not a paddy land and is liable to be excluded from the data bank.
iv) Dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 6th respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.