IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABDUL SALAM – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proper reconsideration of administrative orders. (Para 2) |
| 2. adherence to judicial precedent in administrative procedures. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. To pass a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ Order or Direction, calling for the entire records pertaining to Exhibit P6 Order, quash and set aside the same;
II. To pass a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ Order or Direction, directing the 1st Respondent, Revenue Divisional O – Muvattupuzha to consider Exhibit P5 – Form 5 Application afresh, by evaluating the situation on the basis of the KSREC Report and exclude the property from the Data Bank;
III. To dispense with the filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced herewith;
IV. To pass such Order or Direction, deemed fit and proper according to the facts and circumstances of the Case."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner filed a Form – 5 application in accordance with the the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The same was rejected. The petitioner challenged the same before this Court, and this Court set aside the order and directed the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.