IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAJU E.P – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P10 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.
ii) Declare that the petitioner property is converted before the year 2008 and direct the 2nd respondent to reconsider the Petitioner Ext.P3 Form 5 application and remove the entry of petitioner’s property from data Bank within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble court.
iii) dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition.
iv) pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case. And v) Allow the writ petition writ petition with cost."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner filed a Form – 5 application in accordance with the the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The same was rejected as per Ext.P8 order. The petitioner challenged the same before this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.33229 of 2023, and this Court as per Ext.P9 judgment, set aside Ext.P8 order and directed the authorised officer to reconsider the matter. Thereafter, the Form – 5 app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.