JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P3 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.

ii) Direct the 2nd respondent to reconsider the Petitioner Ext.P2 Form 5 application and remove the entry of petitioner’s property from data Bank by considering the KSREC Report within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble court. iii) dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition.

iv) pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case.

And v) Allow the writ petition writ petition with cost.” [SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 order passed by the 1^st respondent rejecting Ext.P2 Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the