IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOBY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Exhibits P3 and P4 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law;
ii. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd Respondent to reconsider the Petitioner’s application submitted in Form 5 afresh, in the light of the LLMC report and the KSRSEC scientific report, and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
iii. Declare that the Petitioner’s property having an extent of 6 Ares 48 Sqm in Survey No. 35/54-2 of Vallivattom Village, Thrissur District, is not paddy land or wetland as defined under the Act and is not liable to be retained in the Data Bank;
iv. Direct the Respondents to make necessary corrections in the Data Bank and revenue records by removing the classification of the Petitioner’s land as ‘Nilam’;
v. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(SIC)
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the 2nd r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.