IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext P2 order and quash the same to the extent it has not dealt with 24.30 Ares out of the total extent of 26.30 Ares sought to be removed from the data bank.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider Form 5 application and pass orders afresh with regard to an extent of 24.30 Ares which was not considered while passing Ext. P2 order after obtaining a report from the 6th respondent, KSREC with regard to the nature of the property as on 2008.
iii. To issue a writ of mandamus directing the 6th respondent to file a report before the 2nd and 5th respondent with regard to nature and lie of the petitioner’s property in 2008.
iv. To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v. To issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(SIC)
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.