IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANANDAVALLY, AGED 70 YEARS W/O. BALAKRISHNAN KV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) To issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P5 and quash the same;
(ii) To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ order or direction directing Respondents 3 and 4 to allow Form.5 application, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court;
(iii) To dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents (iv) To grant such other and further reliefs as are just, proper and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by her under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioner.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am of the considered opinion that the authorised officer has failed to comply with the statutory requirements. The impugne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.