Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
MADHUSOODHANAN T.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary proceedings initiation and implications (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. responses and appeals to disciplinary actions (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. jurisdiction of high court under article 227 (Para 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. judicial review of tribunal's decisions (Para 18 , 19) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.No.1683 of 2022 filed O.P.(KAT)No.38 of 2026 and the applicant in O.A.No.1633 of 2021 filed O.P.(KAT)No.56 of 2026, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the common order dated 07.11.2024 passed by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal at Thiruvananthapuram, (the ‘Tribunal’ for short).
2. The petitioner in O.P.(KAT)No.56 of 2026 is currently working as a Sub Inspector (Grade) at Koothuparamba Police Station. The petitioner in O.P.(KAT)No.38 of 2026 joined service on 24.07.1984 as a Police Constable of District Armed Service, Kannur and retired from service on superannuation on 31.05.2017. While the petitioner in O.P.(KAT)No.56 of 2026 was working as Police Constable attached to the Crime Squad of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Panoor Circle and the petitioner in O.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
