Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary To Government, Health And Family Welfare Department – Appellant
Versus
Jalaja.K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. original petition regarding eligibility of service benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of irregular appointments. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. dismissal of the original petition. (Para 8) |
| 4. limits of high court's supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. maintenance of judicial integrity and addressing procedural irregularities. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
Muralee Krishna, J.
Respondents 1 and 2 in O.A.No.1023 of 2021, on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short), filed this original petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P6 order dated 04.01.2024 passed by the Tribunal in that original application. For convenience of reference, the parties are referred to in this judgment as they are referred to in the original application.
2. As per the pleadings in the original application, the applicant entered service as a part-time sweeper at the Primary Health Centre, Kanthalloor, with effect from 25.05.1991, and was promoted as Hospital Attender Grade-II in the year 1991 itself. Subsequently, the applicant and similarly appointed
The court upheld that the High Court's supervisory role under Article 227 limits intervention to severe errors, while reaffirming settled matters should not be reopened.
The High Court's supervisory power under Article 227 allows for interference only in cases of gross injustice or procedural lapses, reaffirming that a probationer's termination must follow proper inq....
The mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings cannot be grounds for denying provisional promotion to a qualified member of the feeder category.
Article 227 limits High Court interference to grave perversity; upheld regularization of long-serving sweeper despite nomenclature dispute.
High Court's Article 227 jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate; no interference absent patent perversity or grave injustice in tribunal orders.
The classification of provisional service does not qualify for pension benefits under the applicable government rules and existing case law.
The court reinforced the entitlement of differently-abled individuals to promotional reservations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, mandating compliance with court judgments granting....
The High Court, under Article 227, upheld that disciplinary proceedings were lawfully conducted, with minor penalties validly imposed, affirming limited grounds for supervisory review over administra....
Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction limited; no interference absent perversity or injustice in tribunal orders on disciplinary punishments.
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited and does not permit interference unless there is gross violation of legal principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
