Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
Mukesh Kumar Jain S/o. Chandhamal Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common reliefs in connected writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposing statements filed by respondent. (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioners challenge freezing absent crime nexus. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. alternative remedy under section 503 bnss mandatory. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
1. Since same reliefs are sought in both these Writ Petitions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.28966/2025 is the son of the Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.28204/2025. The prayers in these Writ Petitions are to quash Exts.P1 Communications passed by the Respondent No.2 in V.C.No.09/2025/EKM directing the Respondent No.3 to freeze the bank accounts of the Petitioners mentioned in Exts.P1, to issue a Writ of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No.3 to remove the freeze on the bank accounts of the Petitioners and allow them to use the accounts and to declare that the Bank has no right to freeze the accounts of the Petitioners otherwise than provided under Section 106 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). Ext.P1 in W.P.(C) No.28204/2025 is dated 24.05.2025 and Ext.P1 in W.P.(C) No.28966/2025 is dated 22.05.2025. The allegation in Exts.P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
