Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
A K DIWAKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the review petition, background of the original writ, and initial contentions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal principles governing the scope of review, defining error apparent, and limitations on re-arguing decided matters. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioners in W.P(C)No.9148 of 2025 filed this review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’ for short), pleading that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 23.05.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court, in which one among us [Muralee Krishna S., J.] was sitting along with Amit Rawal, J., by which the writ petition was dismissed. Since Amit Rawal, J., demitted office, this review petition is listed before this Bench, as per the roster.
2. The petitioners filed this review petition with a delay of
252 days. By the order dated 10.03.2026, we condoned the said delay and listed the review petition for consideration.
3. Heard Sri.T.C. Krishna, the learned Central Government Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Ratheesh. B, the learned counsel for the respondent.
4. The learned Senior Pan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
