Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S.
Gopalakrishna Pillai, S/o.Narayana Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Sadasivan Achary, S/o. Damodharan Achary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual background regarding the contested power of attorney. (Para 2) |
| 2. application of limitation period and constructive notice in property transactions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. interpretation of sections 32 and 33 of the registration act concerning power of attorney registration requirements. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final appellate determination allowing the appeal and dismissing the original suit. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
EASWARAN S., J.
This appeal is preferred by the 3rd defendant, being aggrieved by the concurrent findings rendered against him by the Munsiff Court, Adoor in O.S. No.377 of 2003, as well as the District Court, Pathanamthitta, in A.S. No.151 of 2006, which is for cancellation of the power of attorney.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:
The plaintiff is the owner of the property having an extent of 38 cents, which he purchased from the 1st defendant and his brother, Raghunathan, as per sale deed No.1131 of 1997. With the 1st defendant in the party array, O.S. No.24 of 2001 was instituted by one Sudheesh, one of the associates of the 1st defendant, seeking an injunction aga
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
