No right, title, or interest in immovable property can be conferred without a registered document, validating the necessity for registration per applicable laws.

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

Facts of present case in brief are that -:

(a) Petitioner has purchased land in question by way of sale deed dated 14.10.1991. The sale deed was executed by Khadak Singh S/o Sher Singh on basis of an unregistered power of attorney dated 23.07.1989 executed by Ram swaroop the tenant holder.

(b) During consolidation proceedings, the petitioner has filed objections before Assistant Consolidation Officer that on basis of above referred sale deed, his name be recorded in revenue records. Other objections were also filed.

2. The Consolidation Officer by an order dated 04.03.2006 held that power of attorney was a valid document and transaction based on said attorney would legally permissible. Relevant part thereof is quoted below -:

^^fcdzh }kjk gLrk{krj.k dk eq[; vk/kkj dCtk gkrk gSA iM+rky ds le; fookfnr Hkwfe xkVk la[;k 122] 179 ij Jherh lUrks"k ifRu jes'kpUn dk dCtk ik;k x;k tks 10 o"kZ iwoZ ls crk;k x;k vkSj vkdkj i= 2d esa fookfnr Hkwfe ij Jhefr lUrks"k dk cSukesa ds vk/kkj ij dCts dk vUnkt gSA blds vfrfjDr czge flag iq= fryd jke dks lUrks"k dh vkjs ls ijh{k.k djk;k x;k gSA czge flag xzke lHkk f'kjts}kj dk rRdkyhu iz/kku gS rFkk cgcyiqj mDr xzke lHkk ds vUrxZr gSA xokg dk dFku gS fd ^^fookfnr Hkwfe dks eSaus ns[kk gSA Hkwfe ij lUrks"k vkSj muds ifr jes'k pUn dk gh dCtk gS ekSds ij xsgwa dh Qly [kM+h gSA bl izdkj xokg us fookfnr Hkwfe ij Jhefr lUrks"k dk dCtk fl) fd;k gSA izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ ,slk lk{; izLrqr ugha fd;k gS ftlls fookfnr Hkwfe ij mudk dCtk flag gksA blds vfrfjDr LFky ij xzke ys[kiky ls tkap djkbZ xbZ ys[kiky pd oknh us Hkh fnukad 21-05-05 dks fookfnr Hkwfe ij Jherh lUrks"k ifRu jes'k pUn ds dCts dh iqf"V dh gSA

bl izdkj mijksDr leh{kk ds vk/kkj ij eSa bl fu"d"kZ ij igqapk gaw fd cSukek fnukad 14-10-91 [kM+d flag ctfj;s eq[rkjs vke jkeLo:i cgd lUrks"k 'kekZ iRuh jes'k pUn ,d oS/k gLrkarj.k gS rFkk mDr gLrk{kj.k ds vk/kkj ij Jherh larks"k 'kekZ fookfnr Hkwfe dh ladze.kh; Hkwfe/kj gSA cSukek fnukad 13-11-92 jkeLo:i cgd vkseorh vkfn vkSj cSukek fnukad 01-12-92 jkeLo:i cgd ikykjke vkfn vf/kdkj {ks=ghu ,oa /kkjk 52 V~kLQj vkWQ izkWiVhZ ,DV ls ckf/kr gS vr% 'kwU; nLrkost gSA ftuds vk/kkj ij fookfnr Hkwfe esa izfroknhx.k dks dksbZ vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gksrsA vr% rnuqlkj lHkh okn fcUnqvksa dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

fookfnr Hkwfe xkVk la[;k 122@1-72] 179@2-529 ls jke Lo:i iq= ys[kwjke ds uke vkdkj i= 45 ds [kkrk la[;k 80 ubZ xkVk la[;k 135@0-080] 137@0-0160] 163@0-790 ,oa 209@0-040 cus gSaA vr% cSukek fnukad 14-10-91 ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr Hkwfe mDr ij jke Lo:i ds LFkku ij Jhefr larks"k iRuh jes'k pUn dk uke izfrLFkkfir fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA**

(Emphasis Supplied)

3. Aforesaid order was challenged by respondents before Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority vide order dated 03.06.2006 rejected the appeal and relevant part thereof is mentioned below -:

^^;g eq[kR;kjukek i=koyh esa fnukad 29-03-1989 vafdr gSA eq[kR;kjsukesa dh izLrqr Nk;k izfr izekf.kr 'kqnk gS blds laca/k esa vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd ;g eq[kR;kjukek jftLVMZ ugah gS vkSj lu~ 1975 ds okn viathd`r vkys[k dk dksbZ egRo ugha jg tkrk gSA i=koyh ij miyC/k eq[kR;kjsvke fnukad 29-03-89 viathd`r vkys[k gSA jftLV~s'ku ,DV 1908 la'kksf/kr ¼1977½ dh /kkjk 17 esa izkfo/kkfud fd;k x;k gS fd eq[kR;kjsvke iathd`r nLrkost gksuk pkfg, fdUrq iz'uxr eq[kR;kjsvke iathd`r ugha gS ftlls bl dFkr eq[kR;kjsvke fnukad 29-03-89 ds vk/kkj ij [kM+d flag iq= 'ksj flag dks jkeLo:i dh lEifRr dks fodz; djus dk vf/kdkj ugha FkkA bl izdkj [kM+d flag iq= 'ksj flag }kjk fu"ikfnr fodz; i= fnukad 14-10-91 'kwU; nLrkost dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA 'kwU; nLrkost ds vk/kkj ij fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks dksbZ Hkh vf/kdkj izk