1. Governmental restructuring and amalgamation of recognised police associations based on service ranks, challenged for lack of jurisdiction and infringement of fundamental rights. (Para 1 , 2 )
Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 68268
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Preeta A.K., JJ
The State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Police Association – Respondent
W.A.NO.2070 OF 2026|W.A.NO.2072 OF 2026|W.A.NO.2100 OF 2026|W.A.NO.2103 OF 2026
Important Points
The fundamental right to form an association under Article 19(1)(c) is not available to police personnel in associations created by the State where membership is automatic by rank, as such associations lack the individual volition required to trigger constitutional protection.
Subject
Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights
Act Referred
Headnote
(A) Constitution of India - Articles 19(1)(c), 19(4), 33, 162 and 226 - Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 - Rule 8 - Kerala Police Act, 2011 - Section 109 - Restructuring of police associations - Right to form association - Membership based on rank - Whether fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) is infringed by government restructuring of associations where membership is automatic by rank - Held, Article 19(1)(c) does not apply where the formation of the association is not a voluntary act but the creation of the State based on rank, and membership is automatic, lacking individual agency. (Paras 7 and 10)
(B) Judicial Review - Policy decisions of the State Government - Legality to be tested on principles of rationality - Unless State action fails the test of rationality when considered against the main objects of the associations, the court must refrain from interfering in proceedings under Article 226. (Para 12)
Facts of the case:
The Government of Kerala issued an order on 27.07.2026 restructuring three recognized police associations (KPA, KPOA, and KPSOA) by abolishing the KPOA and distributing its members between the remaining two to align them with the current service structure and the Grade Promotion Scheme. This action was challenged via writ petitions on the grounds that it infringed the fundamental right to form associations under Article 19(1)(c) and violated the procedural requirements of Rule 8 of the Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Rules, 1966 and the associations' bye-laws. The learned Single Judge quashed the order, which was subsequently appealed by the State.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that since the associations were created by the Government and membership was automatic based on rank, there was no exercise of individual volition. Consequently, no fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) was invoked or violated. The restructuring was determined to be a rational policy decision intended to enhance the effectiveness of representation based on common service conditions.
Issues: Whether the restructuring of police associations, where membership is determined by rank rather than individual choice, constitutes a violation of the fundamental right to form associations under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(c) are individual rights requiring individual agency; in cases where associations are created by the State and membership is automatic by rank, the members cannot claim a fundamental right to the composition or continuation of such associations.
Result: Appeals allowed.
(B) Judicial Review - Policy decisions of the State Government - Legality to be tested on principles of rationality - Unless State action fails the test of rationality when considered against the main objects of the associations, the court must refrain from interfering in proceedings under Article 226. (Para 12)
Facts of the case:
The Government of Kerala issued an order on 27.07.2026 restructuring three recognized police associations (KPA, KPOA, and KPSOA) by abolishing the KPOA and distributing its members between the remaining two to align them with the current service structure and the Grade Promotion Scheme. This action was challenged via writ petitions on the grounds that it infringed the fundamental right to form associations under Article 19(1)(c) and violated the procedural requirements of Rule 8 of the Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Rules, 1966 and the associations' bye-laws. The learned Single Judge quashed the order, which was subsequently appealed by the State.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that since the associations were created by the Government and membership was automatic based on rank, there was no exercise of individual volition. Consequently, no fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) was invoked or violated. The restructuring was determined to be a rational policy decision intended to enhance the effectiveness of representation based on common service conditions.
Issues: Whether the restructuring of police associations, where membership is determined by rank rather than individual choice, constitutes a violation of the fundamental right to form associations under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(c) are individual rights requiring individual agency; in cases where associations are created by the State and membership is automatic by rank, the members cannot claim a fundamental right to the composition or continuation of such associations.
Result: Appeals allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
- constitutional law
- administrative law
- practice and procedure
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: George Poonthottam (Sr.), Kavya Varma M.M., Nisha George
For the Respondents: P.A. Mohammed Shah, Laya Mary Joseph, P.C. Sasidharan, Babu S. Nair, Alex K. John
For the Appellants/Petitioners: George Poonthottam (Sr.), Kavya Varma M.M., Nisha George
For the Respondents: P.A. Mohammed Shah, Laya Mary Joseph, P.C. Sasidharan, Babu S. Nair, Alex K. John
Table of Contents
2. Petitioners contested the lack of authority and procedural violations of bye-laws, while the State defended the action as a rational, policy-based administrative necessity regarding service conditions. (Para 2 , 3 )
3. The court observed that the associations are government-created without voluntary formation, thereby limiting Article 19(1)(c) protection; the state has rational discretion to improve administrative efficiency through restructuring. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 )
4. Since membership in state-mandated police associations lacks the element of voluntary formation, the right under Article 19(1)(c) is not infringed by administrative restructuring based on service ranks. (Para 7 , 10 )
5. The court set aside the single judge's judgment and dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the validity of the government order for association restructuring. (Para 12 )
6. Does the right to form an association under Article 19(1)(c) apply to police associations formed by the government?
No, because the associations are created by the state and membership is based on rank rather than individual volition, the constitutional right to form associations does not apply in the context of these police organisations. (Para 7 , 10 )
7. To what extent can the government restructure administrative associations for police personnel?
The government, as the authority permitting the formation of police associations, maintains the power to restructure them based on rational administrative criteria, such as grouping personnel with common service conditions, promotional avenues, and grievance mechanisms. (Para 11 , 12 )
8. Does a police association have a legal right to challenge the government's restructuring and amendment of its bye-laws?
While the government has the authority to regulate and restructure associations, any action must not be arbitrary or irrational, however, since the associations are government-initiated structures, their internal bye-laws remain secondary to the state's power to manage the force efficiently. (Para 11 , 12 )
Dr. A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
The State of Kerala and two members of the Kerala Police Association and the Kerala Police Senior Officers' Association respectively are the appellants before us, aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.09.2026 of a learned Single Judge that allowed two writ petitions – W.P.(C).No.26155 of 2026 and W.P.(C).No.26295 of 2026 - that impugned a Government Order through which three recognized associations of the Police Force in the State were restructured by abolishing one and merging its members with the remaining two.
2. It would appear that the Government of Kerala had permitted the formation of three associations in the Police Force by an order of 1979. Accordingly, there came into being the Kerala Police Association [KPA] comprising of Civil Police Officers and Senior Civil Police Officers; the Kerala Police Officers' Association [KPOA] comprising of Grade Assistant Sub Inspectors, Assistant Sub Inspectors, Grade Sub Inspectors, Sub Inspectors and Inspectors of Police, and the Kerala Police Senior Officers' Association [KPSOA] comprising of Deputy Superintendent of Police and Superintendent of Police [Non IPS]. By the order dated 27.07.2026 impugned in the writ petitions, the said associations were restructured by abolishing the KPOA and including Grade Assistant Sub Inspectors, Assistant Sub Inspectors and Grade Sub Inspectors in the Kerala Police Association and Sub Inspectors and Inspectors of Police in the KPSOA. The writ petitioners therefore impugned the Government Order dated 27.07.2026 inter alia on the grounds that (i) the Government did not have the power, authority or jurisdiction to issue the said order; (ii) an association that was recognized by the Government could not have been unilaterally de-recognized, abolished or amalgamated with another association more so when there was no formal order cancelling or evoking the Government Order of 1979 that had permitted the formation of three associations; (iii) the restructuring and consequent formation of the Ad-hoc Committee had been done in a hasty manner and without hearing the abolished association, and hence, the State action smacked of mala fides and illegality; (iv) the procedure envisaged under the bye-laws of the associations for their amendment had not been followed while effecting the restructuring; and (v) the restructuring infringed upon the fundamental right of the members of the association as well as the associations themselves under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India.
3. In the counter affidavit filed by the State, while supporting the reasons cited in the impugned Government Order for the restructuring, it was further clarified as follows:
“10. Before issuing Exhibit P3, the Government undertook a detailed examination of the functioning and composition of the recognized Police Associations in the light of the changes brought about in the Police Force over the years, particularly following the introduction of the Grade Promotion Scheme. During this process, the Government also received representations highlighting certain practical difficulties arising from the existing membership pattern of the recognised Police Associations. On an overall consideration of the relevant administrative factors, it was considered necessary to reorganize the recognized Police Associations so that they correspond to the present service structure and effectively represent personnel having common service interests.
11. The examination revealed that the membership pattern of the recognized Police Associations had been formulated long before the introduction of the Grade Promotion Scheme in 2008 and no longer reflected the present cadre structure. It was therefore considered necessary to revise the composition of the Associations by grouping together personnel having common service conditions, administrative responsibilities and welfare concerns.
12. Under the Grade Promotion Scheme presently in force, personnel completing the prescribed
