Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Aandaperumal – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmiammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals arise from a partition and settlement deed dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff alleges the settlement deed is forged and seeks partition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court examines evidence presented by both parties. (Para 7 , 8 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. points of determination in appeals are established. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. court assesses limitation and necessity of evidence for proofs. (Para 23 , 25 , 27) |
| 6. court confirms judgments based on property ownership and evidence. (Para 35 , 46) |
| 7. final judgment dismisses appeals and confirms trial court's findings. (Para 48) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
These appeals have been preferred as against the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.64 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli dated 11.08.2016, wherein the first respondent in both the appeals has filed a suit for partition in respect of the suit schedule properties and to declare that the settlement deed dated 15.04.1991 is null and void and the same is not binding upon the plaintiff. The trial Court has decreed the suit.
2. Aggrieved by the said decree and judgment the first defendant has preferred an appeal in A.S.No.23 of 2017 and the second defendant has preferr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
