Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
J. NISHA BANU, S. SRIMATHY
M. Kannan @ Solai Kannan, S/o. R. Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the litigations related to thiruparankundram hill. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's observations and reasoning behind the decision. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. the arguments presented address the rights of various religious groups and the implications of the places of worship act. (Para 14 , 16 , 21) |
| 4. conclusions and orders issued by the court. (Para 35 , 36 , 43 , 44) |
| 5. final rulings reflect the court's intent to preserve historical religious practices and prevent disturbances to communal harmony. (Para 38) |
ORDER :
[J. NISHA BANU, J.]
Since the issues involved in all these writ petitions are one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order.
2. Totally six writ petitions have been filed, out of which, two writ petitions, viz. W.P.(MD) Nos.2277 of 2025 & 15565 of 2023, are filed seeking for directions from the respondents concerned to prevent the 8th respondent/ Sikkandar Badhusha Dharga, rep. by its Jamath Members, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District, at any point of time, from performing any form of animal sacrifice in entire Thiruparankundram Hill and also from serving food prepared by animal sacrifi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
