SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
revision petitioner – Appellant
Versus
1st respondent – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

ORDER

This civil revision petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the plaint in O.S.No.21 of 2021 on the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur and strike off the same.

2. The revision petitioner/6th defendant states that the 1st respondent herein had filed a Suit before the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur in O.S.No.21 of 2021 for the relief of declaration, declaring the 3rd item of the scheduled property in S.No.386/9 i.e., the lane belongs to the 1st respondent and for consequential injunction restraining the petitioner and other from interfering the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the 3rd item of suit scheduled property which is a Lane and classified as Government Poramboke land in the revenue records.

3. The revision petitioner/6th defendant having its office adjoining to the lands using the common land along with the other adjacent owner. The plaintiff is the encroacher of the Government land and constructed a building. Therefore, the 4th defendant/Tahsildar issued an encroachment notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 against which the 1st respondent filed W.P. (MD)No.146312 of 2020, in which he had stated that the subject matter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top