Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. DHANABAL, J
I. Stalin S/o. Iruthayanathan (A3) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing-II, Karur Town & District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioners (Para 3) |
| 3. details of the prosecution's case (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis of the facts (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. arguments against the charge sheet (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. discussion on allegations against specific accused (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. court's observations on the investigation (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. arguments regarding prosecution's conduct (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. legal principles regarding prosecution and defense (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. court's conclusion on the merits of the case (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 11. final remarks and implications of the judgment (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 12. summary of legal principles applied in the judgment (Para 31 , 32) |
| 13. final decision of the court (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records and to quash the C.C. No.255 of 2024 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur pending against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 120-B , 420, 406, 408, 409, 466, 467, 468, 471, 477(A), 464 and 109 of IPC .
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, who is the 2n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
