Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice P.B.Balaji, J
M/s.S.K.V.Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner E.Vivekananth – Appellant
Versus
Sivamalar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition seeks to dismiss plaint in civil matter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention of bona fide purchase against abuse of process. (Para 5 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments of plaintiffs regarding knowledge and legal standing. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's view on the jurisdiction of civil courts in partition. (Para 9 , 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. cautions usage of striking off powers; affirms jurisdiction. (Para 16) |
| 6. final dismissal of the case with allowance to pursue remedies. (Para 18) |
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the 7th defendant in O.S.No.222 of 2024 before the II Additional District Judge, Thiruchengode. The revision petitioner seeks to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.222 of 2024.
2.I have heard Mr.K.Shakespeare, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, Mr.A.V.Arun for Mr.N.Kolandaivelu, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3, Mr.J.Vinoth, learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6, and Mr.M.L.Ganesh, learned counsel for the 8th respondent and Mr.A.Anandan, learned Government Advocate the respondents 10 to 12.
3.Mr.K.Shakespeare, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, taking me through the plaint averments and the relief sought for therein, would state that the suit is a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
