Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
M. Nainmal Sagarmal Kankariya – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Baskar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for eviction due to non-execution of tenancy agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. matters concerning premature application for eviction. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. clarifications on statutory obligations of tenant and landlord. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. the court's view on maintaining eviction applications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. interpreting statutory timelines under the act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. discussion of cause of action and its relevance to eviction. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. outcome of the eviction petition. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant challenging the concurrent findings of the learned Rent Controller dated 24.11.2021 in R.L.T.O.P.No.290 of 2019 and the learned Appellate Authority dated 18.08.2023 in R.L.T.A.No.69 of 2022, whereby an order of eviction was passed against the revision petitioner on the ground that no written tenancy agreement was entered into or in force after the commencement of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (“TNRRRLT Act” for brevity).
2. The respondent/landlord contended that he is the absolute owner of the petition sch
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
