Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, G. ARUL MURUGAN, JJ
G.Sivakumar – Appellant
Versus
The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenges to bar association actions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disputed conduct and behavior within bar association. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court allows resumption of membership considering misconduct claims. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal profession's duties towards clients and justice system. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial stance on strikes/boycotts by advocates. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. legal system integrity threatened by strikes, calls for reforms. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. consequences of strikes/boycotts on justice delivery. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. judicial obligation to proceed despite strikes by advocates. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. advocates' commitment to justice outweighs calls for boycotts. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 10. advice to bar associations on maintaining professionalism. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 11. directions for bar associations to follow the supreme court guidelines. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 12. judgment concludes with the resolution of the writ petitions. (Para 30) |
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
The writs on hand have been instituted challenging the validity of the action initiated by the Nagarcoil Bar Association debarring the petitioner from entering into the Bar As
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
