Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J
P.Ramalingam – Appellant
Versus
State by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and conviction details. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of the bribery incident and trap setup. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. investigation and submission of the charge sheet. (Para 5) |
| 4. defendant's arguments regarding procedure and discrepancies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. prosecution's response and evidence of bribery. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. final arguments before the court. (Para 12) |
| 7. court observations on procedural adherence. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 8. doubts raised on evidence and procedures. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 9. issues with recovery and prosecution's case. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. legal standards for proving bribery under the law. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. conclusion and acquittal of the appellant. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
The appellant was convicted by judgment dated 29.11.2018 in Special C.C.No.21 of 2014 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur (Special Court for trial of cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ) and sentenced to undergo three years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section 7 of and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
