IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, R.VIJAYAKUMAR, JJ
C.Mary Rosalind – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Department of School Education – Respondent
(Made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
The petitioner in WP(MD).No.2326 of 2009 has filed the present writ appeal challenging the disallowed portion of the order of the writ Court.
(A).Factual Matrix:
2.The appellant herein was appointed as a P.G.Assistant (History) in the fifth respondent School on 04.06.2007 in the retirement vacancy of one Mr.P.Balakrishnan Nair. The management has forwarded a proposal to the authority for approval of the said appointment on 12.09.2007. By way of proceedings dated 02.01.2008, the proposal was returned by the authority on the ground that as per staff fixation for the academic year 2007-2008, only one post is sanctioned and the other posts have been rendered surplus. The School had addressed a communication on 08.01.2008 to the authorities seeking for approval again. On 17.03.2008, it was informed that there is no scope for filling up the said post, in view of staff fixation order for the academic year 2007-2008. On 17.03.2008, the authorities had passed an order informing that one post of P.G.Assistant (History) has been surrendered by the fifth respondent School. Aggrieved over the staff fixation order dated 02.01.2008 and the consequential order dated 17.03.2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.