SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY
Muthukumar – Appellant
Versus
Pari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.PT.S. Narendravasan
For Respondent: M/s.M. Sakundala Devi

Table of Content
1. overview of civil revision petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. defendant's failure to appear and request for decree dismissal (Para 3 , 5)
3. requirements for a valid judgment under cpc (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. judgment requirements and criticisms of trial court's reasoning (Para 10)
5. principles informing reversal of moving court judgments (Para 11 , 12 , 15)
6. final ruling to set aside lower court's order, granting re-evaluation (Para 16)

ORDER :

S.SRIMATHY, J.

1.The issue involved in both the Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the suit filed in O.S.No.142 of 2001 and hence the following common order is passed.

2(i). The Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.(MD)No.706 of 2020 is filed by the defendant in the suit to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order, dated 01.02.2020 passed in E.A.No.41 of 2018 in E.P.No.10 of 2010 in O.S.No.142 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Paramakudi. The said E.A.No.41 is filed inter alia praying to return of articles found in the inventory report dated 07.05.2013.

2.(ii). The Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.(MD)No.706 of 2020 is filed by the defendant in the suit to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order, dated 01.02.2020 passed in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top