SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5237

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. RAMESH, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ.
Jipmer Hospital Employees Union Rep. By Its President – Appellant 
Versus 
Jawaharlal Institute Of Post Graduate Medical Education And Research, Rep. By Its Director – Respondent 
W.A.Nos.3187 of 2023, 222 of 2025, C.M.P.Nos.26094 of 2023, 1558, 1561 of 2025, W.A.No.3187 of 2023
Decided On : 16-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel For Mr.T.Saikrishnan
For the Respondent: Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General Of India Assisted By Mr.M.T.Arunan, Standing Counsel, Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy, (Spccg)

Continuous employment of daily rated laborers without regularization constitutes unfair labor practice, and they are entitled to regularization after 10 years of service, affirming the principles in Umadevi (3).

Headnote:(A) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F and 25-H - Employees seeking regularization of service - Writ Appeal allowed directing regularization for daily rated laborers who have completed 10 years of service as per the principles established in Umadevi (3)'s case. Court affirmed the legislative mandate for fair treatment of labor. (Paras 4, 26, 48)

(B) Unfair Labour Practices - Continuous engagement of daily rated laborers for long periods without regularization amounts to unfair labor practices - The employer cannot benefit from its own wrong in failing to create sanctioned posts. (Paras 16, 19, 25)

(C) Employment Rights - Denial of regularization to workers performing perennial functions violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. (Paras 25, 34)

Facts of the case:
JIPMER engaged daily rate laborers for various departments, who sought regularization after years of service. The CGIT awarded them regularization, which JIPMER contested leading to judicial review.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed that the nature of work performed by the laborers justified their right to regularization, rejecting arguments against their appointments.

Issues: The two primary issues were whether the prolonged engagement amounted to unfair labor practices and whether the provisions from Umadevi (3) impacted the statutory rights for regularization under labor laws.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that continuous engagement without regularization showed intent to avoid liability and that labor laws allow for judicial intervention in cases of unfair practices.

Result: Writ Appeal allowed, directing regularization of services for eligible laborers.

Table of Content
1. nature of drls work and their classification at jipmer. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on the legality and regularization of drls. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's consideration of drl engagement duration and employer obligations. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. legal obligations regarding regularization and dhimita from umadevi case. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 28 , 29)
5. clarification on applicability of umadevi case to industrial adjudications. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 38 , 40)
6. judicial review limitations and jipmer's inability to regularize drls. (Para 45 , 46)
7. final court order regarding drls regularization. (Para 49 , 50)

JUDGMENT :

M.S. RAMESH, J.

Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (hereinafter referred to as ‘JIPMER’) is a premier hospital in the Union Territory of Puducherry, which have been engaging daily rated labourers (DRLs) in their various Departments as under:-

DIETETICS DEPARTMENT for the duties of vegetable cutting, assisting in cooking, diet issue, distribution in ward/milk/fruit/diet tray collection and washing laundry, linen collection from ward/washing and drying the linen/dry cleaning/distribution of linen to ward.

LINEN SECTION for the duties of stitching the cloth and cutting pillow cover, bed sheet, face mask.

NURSING SECTION/WARD for the duties of patient shifting/patient care/sample collection/urine blood measuring/stretcher bearing/barber work/ward shifting/indent collection from central store, CSSD, laundry, pharmacy and stationary, ICU, OT, shifting of patient for CT Scan/MRI, X-ray from ward.

MEDICAL RECORD DEPARTMENT for the duties of registration of CCR/OP & IP case, medical record file/census collection/dead body put in and take out the dead body for postmortem.

OFFICE OF DEPARTMENTS for the duties of dispatching tapals to various departments, sections, unit and file movement to other departments/section/Administration block, SRB/Petty cash movement, refreshment work, table chairs and arrangements for departmental meeting/conference etc., dispatching the speed post to post office, dispatching the DD/Postal order in Bank, indent collection from stationary department/CSSD/Linen section/laundry.

ACADEMIC SECTION/EXAMINATION/COLLEGE OF NURSING for the duties of dispatching the tapal to various section, department, units and admin block, petty cash, SRB, file movement to various department, section, units, refreshment arrangement for meeting, exam paper collection, decoding work, packing of exam papers, question papers packing.

2. There are 72 categories of Group-D posts in the Institute. The Sixth Central Pay Commission recommended these Group-D posts to be upgraded into Group-C posts and recommended for revision of the recruitment rules. The recommendation also prohibited further recruitment to Group-D posts and the existing Group-D posts to be placed in Group-C pay band. The minimum qualification for appointment to this level will be either 10th pass or ITI or equivalent. Recommendations were also made for multi skilling, with one employee performing jobs hitherto performed by different Group-D employees and placing them with a common designation. As per the subsequent D.O.P.T guidelines, 51 categories of posts were identified and redesignated as Multi-tasking Staff. Among the displaced DRLs, several of them who possess the required qualification were absorbed in the Group-C posts. The unsuccessful DRLs, who were either not absorbed in Group-C posts or claimed to have been working for several years as DRLs, raised disputes before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Conciliation) Puducherry, from the year 2012 onwards. On the failure of the conciliation proceedings, the Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment, through its order dated 03.01.2014, referred the Industrial Dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai (hereinafter called as ‘CGIT’), for adjudication. The point of reference therein reads as follows

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top