Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
V.Kathiravan – Appellant
Versus
1.Veluchamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition claims and family properties (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. limited right of appeal under section 100 cpc (Para 12 , 14 , 29) |
| 3. burden of proof for ancestral property (Para 16 , 18) |
| 4. legal principles regarding separate properties (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. dismissing the appeal due to lack of grounds (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.144 of 2018 dated 18.11.2019 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.204 of 2013 dated 08.02.2018 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
2. The appellant is the plaintiff. He filed a suit claiming partition and allottment of ¼ share in the suit properties.
3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as per their status / ranking in the trial Court.
4. The case of the plaintiff, in short, is as follows:
(a) The plaintiff is the son and the defendants 2 and 3 are the daughters of the first defendant. The first item of the suit properties and some other properties originally owned by one Aanaiappapillai, father of the first defendant. After the death of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
