Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
K.Dheivakumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding petitioners' qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the inclusion of petitioners. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. analysis of government orders and their implications. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. court's ruling on qualification acceptance. (Para 32) |
| 5. conclusion and directive for inclusion of petitioners. (Para 33) |
COMMON ORDER
Assailing the impugned provisional selection list in which the names of the petitioners have been omitted to be included inspite of them getting higher marks and satisfying all the relevant qualification criteria, the present writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners.
2. The short facts leading to the filing of the writ petitions could be stated as under :-
Pursuant to the notification dated 27.10.2025 calling for applications for filling up 1429 vacancies in the post of Health Inspector Grade II, the petitioners, who belong to Persons with Disabilities category and MBC submitted their applications, whereinafter, they were called for written examination and upon publication of the results, the petitioners, having scored
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
