SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1940

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ., G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. 
Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Employees Association, rep. By its State Vice President S.Murugesan - Petitioner 
Versus  
The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Cooperation, Food & Consumer Protection – Respondent
WP Nos.31973 and 17071 of 2025
Decided On : 05-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.C.Prakasam
For the Respondents:Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate general, asst. by Mrs.M.Geetha Thamaraiselvan Special Government Pleader

The provisions for a common cadre in the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act do not violate constitutional autonomy, as reasonable State regulation is permissible for effective governance.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 74 and 75(1) - Constitution of India - Article 19(1)(c) r/w Article 43B - Challenge to the validity of common cadre service rules declared ultra vires - The provisions of the Act centralize control over cooperative societies undermining their autonomy which is guaranteed under the Constitution. The court emphasized that while cooperatives enjoy autonomy, such autonomy is not absolute and State regulation for efficient management is permissible. (Paras 1, 4, 10, 16, 20)

(B) The court held that the provisions contained within Sections 74 and 75 are not manifestly arbitrary and do not violate the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. (Paras 19, 20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 74 and 75(1) of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, arguing they are ultra vires Article 19(1)(c) and Article 43B, which guarantees autonomy for cooperative societies. The petitioners argued that the government retains excessive control over cooperative society governance and services through the proposed common cadre.

Findings of Court:
The court found that, notwithstanding the provisions granting control to the State, the cooperative societies retain a significant degree of autonomy necessary for their effective functioning and management.

Issues: The main questions addressed include whether the provisions of the Act infringe upon the autonomy of cooperative societies as protected under the Constitution, and the legality of the common cadre constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced that autonomy does not equate to complete independence from State oversight. It concluded that reasonable restrictions imposed by State legislation for effective management of cooperatives do not undermine their constitutional guarantees.

Result: The petitions are dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petition filed against the tamil nadu cooperative societies act. (Para 1)
2. arguments against sections 74 and 75 affecting autonomy. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's analysis of constitutional amendments related to cooperatives. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. legitimacy of state control over cooperative societies. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. petition dismissed; no costs. (Para 21)

ORDER :

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.

The aforesaid two writ petitions have been filed seeking declaration declaring Section 74 and 75(1) of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, and the consequential Government Orders dated 12.02.2019, 15.02.2024 and 24.01.2024 of the first respondent constituting the Tamil Nadu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Common Cadre Service Rules, 2019 as ultra vires Article 19(1) (c) read with Article 43B of the Constitution of India and the preamble part of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983, as amended by Act No.4 of 2013.

2. Submissions made on behalf of the petitioners :

(a) Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that Sections 74 and 75 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act and common pool cadre rules affect the autonomy of the Cooperative societies. The provisions contained in the aforesaid two sections are State-centric and while constituting common cadre of service in respect of the posts of Secretaries, Assistant Secretaries, Executive Officers, Assistant Executive Officers, General Managers, Assistant General Managers, Managers, Assistant Managers, Purchase Managers, Purchase Officers, Assistant Purchase Officers, Development Officers, Chief Accountants, Chief Accounts Officers, Accounts Officers, State has retained absolute control in every aspect of recruitment, disciplinary action, transfer, posting etc.

(b) The competent authority, being a committee formed in Rule 3 sub-Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Rules, alone is declared competent to recruit, appoint, transfer, suspend, take disciplinary action, terminate, decide all new matters etc., common cadre officers/employees, mostly of administrative/managerial rank. The power which has been reserved in the hands of the committee, thus for all legal and practical purposes, is the supreme body, next to the State. Thus, the entire power has been centralized in a manner that the autonomy of the Cooperative Societies has been completely taken away.

(c) The Cooperative Societies do not have any such control which the State or its authority exercises in respect of all the common cadre officers/ employees. This statutory scheme of the Act and the rules is destructive of complete and full autonomy of the Cooperative Societies. It also incidentally imposes unreasonable restrictions on the fundamental right to form Cooperative Society under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India, as amended, along with insertion of Article 43B of the Constitution of India, in 2012.

(d) Article 43B of the Constitution of India, though part of the Directive Principles of the State Policy, nevertheless provides that the State shall endeavour to promote autonomous functioning. Therefore, while framing legislation, the State's objective must be directed towards fulfillment of these directive principles and policies. Any provision or scheme of the legislation, which is destructive of the autonomy would be ultra vires Article 43B of the Constitution of India.

(e) Consequent upon insertion of Article 43B of the Constitution of India, the preamble to the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act was also amended, which clearly provides that it is expedient to promote functional autonomy.

(f) Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act was enacted prior to insertion of Article 43B of the Constitution of India. After insertion of Article 43B of the Constitution of India, the preamble was also amended to bring it in tune with the new provision in the Constitution and, therefore, the Act, after the amendment in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top