Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
P.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secretary Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 5. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. intra-court appeal basis related to land assignment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's argument regarding violation of notice and assignment terms. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on land use and violation of assignment terms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. clarification on principles of natural justice regarding show cause notice. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling on appeal dismissal based on factual findings. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. conclusion and order of dismissal. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The present intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent has been instituted to assail the writ order dated 06.04.2022 passed in WP.No.26866 of 2017.
2. ‘Natham’ house site to an extent of 0.01.0 Ares in Natham survey No.136/1 was allotted in favour of the appellant/writ petitioner vide assignment proceeding, dated 10.11.1994 under Revenue Standing Order.No.21(7)(ii), subject to terms and conditions as contemplated under the Revenue Standing Orders . The main conditions are that the house to an extent of the measurements mentioned in the schedule to the assignment order with roof made up of coconut leaf or tile shall be constructed within six/t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
