Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, R.Sakthivel, JJ
M/S. RENAULT NISSAN TECHNOLOGY AND – Appellant
Versus
GANESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case including the accident details and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. tribunal's award and appeals by both parties. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding negligence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's evaluation of evidence and determination of negligence. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's ratio decidendi on the just conclusions of the tribunal. (Para 17) |
| 6. final conclusions and orders regarding compensation. (Para 19) |
(Judgment of the Court was made by R.Sakthivel, J.)
Feeling aggrieved by the Award dated September 5, 2022 passed by 'the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge No.1, Court of Small Causes, Chennai' ['Tribunal' for short] in M.C.O.P. No.1944 of 2018, the petitioners therein have preferred C.M.A. No.1985 of 2025 praying to enhance the compensation awarded, while the respondent therein namely Renault Nissan Technology and Business Centre India Pvt. Ltd., has preferred C.M.A. No.1832 of 2024 praying to set aside the Award.
2. This Common Judgment will now decide both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, as they both arise out of one and the same Award.
3. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the part
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
