J. NISHA BANU, R. SAKTHIVEL
Kasthuri – Appellant
Versus
T. Kumaran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Judgment of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)
PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award dated July 31, 2023 passed in M.C.O.P.No.640 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Special Sub Judge No.II (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award dated July 31, 2023 passed in M.C.O.P.No.640 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Special Sub Judge No.II (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
These two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are arising out of the ‘Award dated July 31, 2023, passed in M.C.O.P.No.640 of 2018' ['impugned Award' for short] by the 'Special Sub Judge – II (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal), Court of Small Causes, Chennai' ['Tribunal' for short]. The petitioner in the aforesaid Original Petition has filed C.M.A.No.3048 of 2023 seeking enhancement of compensation. The second respondent/Insurance Company has filed C.M.A.No.691 of 2024 praying to set aside the impugned Award. This Common Judgment will now dispose of both these Civil Miscellaneous
Sarla Verma -vs- Delhi Transport Corporation reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680
The court affirmed the Tribunal's findings on negligence and compensation calculation, emphasizing the lack of evidence for contributory negligence and the appropriateness of the awarded amount.
The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision on contributory negligence and confirmed the compensation awarded for the loss of life, applying proper legal standards regarding income assessment and futu....
The court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation for a fatal motorcycle accident, affirming findings of negligence and the calculation method used for compensation.
Insurance liability depends on driving negligence proof.
The court affirmed the Tribunal's findings of negligence by the respondent's driver, modified the compensation to Rs.21,10,000/-, and established principles regarding accident liability and notional ....
Tribunal's compensation quantum upheld: income from payslips, 25% future prospects, multiplier 14 for 44-year-old deceased with four dependents.
Triple riding alone does not constitute contributory negligence without specific evidence of negligence.
The burden of proof in negligence cases, admissibility of medical and police records, and principles for calculating compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.