Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Mahaboob Sheriff – Appellant
Versus
The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. core details about the waqf deed and parties involved. (Para 1 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments on the nature of the waqf as private versus composite. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis on the applicability of waqf regulations. (Para 7 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. interpretation clarity regarding jurisdiction and hereditary appointments. (Para 18 , 21) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing board's actions as unjustified. (Para 22) |
ORDER
The revision petitioners are the applicants in O.A. No.93 of 2023 before the Waqf Tribunal filed under Section 83 (1) and 83(2) of the Wafq Act, 1995 challenging the resolution of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board dated 26.09.2023 and the consequential order of the Chief Executive Officer of the Waqf Board dated 10.11.2023 and also for a permanent injunction to restrain respondents 3 to 6 from in any manner interfering with the administration of Waqf and its properties at the hands of the first applicant/revision petitioner.
2. I have heard Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahamed, learned Senior Counsel for Mrs.I.Kowser Sulthana and Mr.T.Saikrishnan, learned counsel for R1 & R2 and Mr.M.M.I.Kaleel, learned counsel for R3 to R6.
3. The learned Senior Counsel Mr.Nissar A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
