Back
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Muhammad Yahya (died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on the establishment and management of a waqf. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the nature and control of the waqf. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. jurisdictional issues concerning the waqf tribunal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. definition and significance of waqf-alal-aulad. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. historical context and evolution of waqf law. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. comparison of waqf acts and their implications. (Para 25 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. analysis of key waqf deeds and associated wills. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. legal reasoning regarding the validity of the waqf deed. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. observations on the interpretation of charitable purposes. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 10. final judgment and orders related to the waqf. (Para 61 , 62) |
ORDER :
Both these revisions are preferred against the order and decreetal order passed in O.A.No.19 of 2011 dated 27.04.2014 by the Waqf Tribunal cum I Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai.
HISTORY OF THE CASE :
2. There existed one Muslim gentleman by name Janab K. Magdoom Muhammed Marakayar. He belonged to the Shafi school of Islam. However, during his life time, he embraced the Hanafi school and also declared that he belongs to the latter
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
