Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
K.Buvaneswari – Appellant
Versus
J.Jegajothi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of family relationships and property ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on grounds of appeal and legal representations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. counterarguments against the plaintiff's claim. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 4. court's consideration of limitation periods for filing suits. (Para 15) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of appeal. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
The appellant is the plaintiff in a suit for partition, aggrieved by rejection of plaint in I.A.No.25 of 2025, has preferred the present first appeal. After arguments and judgment was also reserved in the appeal, the appellant came out with an application in C.M.P.(MD)No.5759 of 2026 for raising additional grounds in the appeal and hence, the appeal suit was reopened and further arguments were heard on 27.02.2026. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed seeking permission to raise additional grounds is taken up along with the main Appeal.
2.Pleadings:
The plaint in brief:
2.1. The Plaintiff is the daughter of Ekambara Mudaliar, who owned the schedule mentioned properties. He was married to Anjalakshi Ammal and they blessed with a son Jayavel. After the demise of his wife Anjalakshi Ammal, in 1948, the said Ekambara Mudal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
