Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. MARIA CLETE, J
Mrs.Bhuvaneswari – Appellant
Versus
R.Maragatham – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges final decree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts of the partition suit. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. procedural developments in decree application. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding preliminary decree amendments. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. plaintiff counsels argue against the appeal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. issues framed for consideration. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. discussion about preliminary decree amendments. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. decision on procedural irregularity in decree amendment. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 28) |
| 9. challenge of unregistered will at execution stage. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. res judicata application on probate proceedings. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. finality of probate order affects appeal. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 12. final decision on the appeal. (Para 38) |
J U D G M E N T C
This appeal has been preferred by the second defendant in O.S. No.21 of 2007, who was also the second respondent in I.A. No. 27 of 2013, challenging the final decree dated 21.04.2017 passed in I.A. No. 27 of 2013 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District, by which the final decree application came to be allowed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
