Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, V. Lakshminarayanan, JJ
V.Ramakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Kulasekhar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 2. claims regarding the koorchit and property transfers. (Para 3 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. joint family property distribution under hindu law. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. settlement deeds and their legal validity. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 5. injunctions and final orders. (Para 34 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.Lakshminarayanan J.)
The appellant is the third defendant in the suit. He assails the judgment and decree of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur at Ponneri, in O.S.No.34 of 2010 dated 18.01.2021.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.
3. The plaintiffs 1 to 3 and defendants 1 and 2 are the children of one late Ramachandra Naidu. The 5th defendant is the daughter of the first defendant, the granddaughter of Ramachandra Naidu. She was arrayed as a party, as the first defendant had executed a settlement deed in her favour. The 4th plaintiff and the 3rd defendant are the purchasers of the suit schedule property from the plaintiffs, and the fifth defendant, respectively.
4. The case of the plaintiffs is that there exi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
