Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mohammed Shaffiq, J
Hariharasudhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner violated initial bail conditions by threatening complainant post-release. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties argue on bail cancellation validity and breach evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. lower court justified bail cancellation due to threats and condition violation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. supreme court principles: bail cancellation for threats, tampering, or investigation interference. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. bail cancellation upheld; settlement possible without interference. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
Heard Mr. A.K.H.M. Mohamed Abdul Rasiq, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner and Mr. Thiruvadi Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent.
2. The present criminal revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.12.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 2862 of 2025, whereby Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, has cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner in Cr. No. 304 of 2025 dated 28.04.2025, on the premise that petitioner violated the conditions imposed on petitioner for grant of bail vide order dated 28.08.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 2147 of 2025 in Cr.No.304 of 2025.
3. Briefly the allegation against the petitioner was that at the time when de-facto complainant and her
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
