Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
Meenachi – Appellant
Versus
Rajalekshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of suit for partition and injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial, appeal procedures and issues framed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. rejection of additional evidence application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. nature of suit properties under inheritance. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. admissibility of unregistered family arrangement deed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. effect of sale deed and impleadment; decision. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
1.The Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.74 of 2014, dated 01.04.2019, on the file of the Principal District Court, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.74 of 2007, dated 19.07.2010, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.
2. The appellants are the plaintiffs and they filed a suit in O.S.NO.74 of 2007, before the Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, claiming partition and allotment of 3/12 shares in the suit properties and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from aleinating or encumbering the suit properties.
3. For the sake of convenience and brevity,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
