SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1985

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE, J
Nihal Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

ORDER

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is in the nature of writ of quo-warranto challenging the very election of present respondent No.6 as a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Manpur, Tehsil Joura, District Morena, on account of respondent no.6 incurring disqualifications to hold the office of the Sarpanch as prescribed under Section 36(1) (a)(ii) of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam , 1993, as while contesting the election he had falsely stated that no case was pending against him, nor he had been convicted in any case, whereas, a criminal case bearing number 480/2008 was registered against respondent number 6 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Joura, which was decided on 07.08.2015.

2. Short facts leading to the controversy are that in the year, 2022 an election to the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Manpur, Tehsil Joura, District Morena took place, in which respondent no.6 contested the election, however, while submitting his form he did not disclose the fact that a criminal case being registered against him, nor he had been convicted in any case, whereas, a criminal case bearing number 480/2008 was tried against him in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top