Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Shri Datt, J
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (M/s.) v. State of M.P.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for quashing cognizance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. misbranding allegations under the drugs act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. directors' responsibility in corporate conduct. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 4. legal standards for vicarious liability. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. Petitioners have filed this application for quashing the order taking cognizance as also the entire proceeding in Criminal Case No. 2647 of 1985 pending in the Court of the Additional Chief, Judicial Magistrate, Jabalpur. It appears that on the basis of a complaint made by the Drug Inspector, the learned Magistrate, by its order dated 19-7-1985, took cognizance of the offence under S.18/27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to the Act for brevity) and directed for issuance of process against the petitioners.
2. Petitioner No. 1 is a company having its registered office in the State of Haryana and petitioner No. 2 is its Managing Director. Petitioner No. 3 has been termed as member of the Board of Directors, but Shri Datt, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks permission to delete petitioner No. 3, permission to delete the name of p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
