SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK JAIN
Aditya Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Perena Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Achyut Govindam Tiwari and Shri Kaustubh Tiwari, Advs.

ORDER :

VIVEK JAIN, J.

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner-husband being aggrieved by the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the Family Court, Jabalpur, whereby application of the petitioner under Section 44-A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, has been rejected by the Family Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued before this Court that a marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised in India on 28.11.2019 and a marriage certificate was issued by the Marriage Registering Officer, Jabalpur on 02.12.2019. It is argued that both the parties i.e. petitioner-husband and respondent-wife are citizens of India but because the husband is at present domiciled in New Zealand as he is residing in New Zealand since the year 2021 and he intends to settle down in New Zealand permanently, therefore, he filed an application for divorce before the Court at New Zealand i.e. Family Court, Auckland, New Zealand in FAM-2023-095-005830 under Family Proceedings Act, 1980 applicable in New Zealand.

3. It is argued that on account of irreconcilable breakdown of marriage, which is a ground under Section 39 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top